Latest

The current assessment

Where things appear to stand, and where they may be heading, judged from every item flagged on this site so far.

Written by Claude, an AI model, on 7 Oct 2026, 15:52 Stockholm time, from the 100 items flagged on this site since 24 September 2026, the recent ones weighted most. It is a judgement, revised as the evidence changes. It is read against our own view and may depart from it. The numbers for the longer run come from runs of the model. Nothing here is investment advice.

What changed. First assessment.

Now

Long-term borrowing costs are rising across rich countries faster than their economies are weakening, while the labour market is quiet on the surface but hollow underneath.

US ten-year yields reached about 5.35% and thirty-year yields about 5.71% in early October, the highest since 2002; Britain's thirty-year yield passed 6%, and France's ten-year spread over Germany reached 152 basis points on 2 October. Oil near $100-115 adds inflation, and central banks are raising rates rather than cutting. In jobs, US unemployment is 4.2% and claims are low, but over twelve months all net job growth came from health care and social assistance, labour's share of business output is the lowest since 1947, and employers from HSBC to DNB now name AI in cuts to office work. On this reading, the strain shows first in government finances and in the composition of work, not yet in unemployment.

Our view, point by point

How far the evidence so far bears out each point of our view, on this assessment.

The coming months

The most likely course over the next six to twelve months is higher rates for longer, with fiscal tightening in Europe and a growing risk that the AI investment boom stalls on its financing costs.

France's 2027 budget (votes through the autumn) and its spring 2027 presidential election, Britain's budget on 28 October and US Treasury auctions will test whether buyers keep absorbing government debt. Debt-financed AI spending is large (about $450bn of AI-related debt issued this year by early September) and some private-credit funds have limited withdrawals. Should equity prices or credit markets break while oil stays high and central banks are tightening, there is a world in which job losses come quickly and, because firms automate rather than rehire, do not come back; US unemployment rising half a point from its low, with hiring still weak, would be the first sign.

The longer run

To about 2030-32, the evidence is consistent with a slow but persistent shift of income from wages toward the owners of capital and sites, with public budgets under growing strain.

Labour's falling share and the concentration of hiring in care fit a change that began two to four years ago, but the pace measured so far is well below the fastest paths one could draw. The more likely run assumes a smaller collapse of AI investment than the dot-com bust and a slower spread. A plausible worst case combines a severe bust with policy that turns to austerity and trade barriers as unemployment rises; in that world unemployment could reach levels not seen since the 1930s, and what would show it early is job losses that persist through a recovery.

Out of work counts the unemployed and those who have left the workforce after losing their job. The runs are the model's; they show what follows from their settings, not a forecast.

Most likely, on this assessment

A labour depression, output held

The share of people out of work reaches depression levels while policy keeps output from collapsing: it holds up spending but does little for employment.

The model's central case, except:

  • Size of the AI investment bust: Mild
  • Jobs AI takes each year: Half

In this run: 6% of the US workforce out of work at the end of 2028; 15% and still rising when the run ends, in Q2 2032; the four economies' output at worst −6.1% against what they could produce.

Open this run in the model

A plausible worst case

A depression

Output falls on the scale of 1929–33: the four economies together lose a fifth or more of their capacity.

The model's central case, except:

  • How governments respond: Policies erode
  • Size of the AI investment bust: Severe

In this run: 21% of the US workforce out of work at the end of 2028; the model's limit of 50% reached by Q2 2031; the four economies' output at worst −36.1% against what they could produce.

Open this run in the model

What would count against it

US spending rose 0.9% in August, initial claims are near 197,000, stock indices are at record highs and Korea's exports rose 83.5% in September: the AI investment boom is still expanding and consumers are still spending, so a downturn is not visible in the data yet.

The evidence it weighed most

Each item counts fully on the day it is flagged and half as much 14 days later. These are the ten stories that weighed most when the assessment was written, out of 100 items, each with its latest item.

How the assessment has changed

  1. (current). First assessment.

    • Now. Long-term borrowing costs are rising across rich countries faster than their economies are weakening, while the labour market is quiet on the surface but hollow underneath.
    • The coming months. The most likely course over the next six to twelve months is higher rates for longer, with fiscal tightening in Europe and a growing risk that the AI investment boom stalls on its financing costs.
    • The longer run. To about 2030-32, the evidence is consistent with a slow but persistent shift of income from wages toward the owners of capital and sites, with public budgets under growing strain.